Animal Farm: What the Movie Gets Right, What the Book Does Better, and Why It's Worth Seeing Either Way

Animal Farm is in theaters.

For anyone who read the book, that's a complicated piece of news. Orwell's novella is one of the most precise things ever written about how power works. Turning it into an animated family film is a choice that invites scrutiny.

Here's what the 2026 version gets right, what the book does better, and why the story matters either way.

What the Story Is About

For anyone who hasn't read the book: Animal Farm is a short novella published by George Orwell in the 1940s. The animals on a farm rebel against their neglectful human owner and take control, declaring that all animals are equal and that no animal shall oppress another.

It doesn't stay that way.

The pigs — smarter and more organized than the rest — gradually take charge. One pig in particular, Napoleon, consolidates power by driving out his rival, rewriting the rules of the farm, and slowly turning the other animals' hard work into his own comfort. The commandments the animals agreed to at the start are changed, one by one, until the final one reads: All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.

Orwell wrote the book as an allegory for how revolutionary movements betray their own ideals — how the language of equality gets used to justify its opposite. He was writing about the Soviet Union specifically, but the pattern he named is older than Stalin and broader than any one regime.

That pattern is what makes this story last.

The Movie

The new animated film, directed by Andy Serkis and distributed by Angel Studios, keeps the bones of the story. The revolution happens. The pigs take over. Napoleon rises. Boxer the horse is loyal to his own undoing. The commandments get rewritten. The ending echoes Orwell's.

It also makes significant changes.

The film adds a new central character — Lucky, a young piglet voiced by Gaten Matarazzo — who serves as the audience's guide through the story. He's not in the book. His role is to make the allegory accessible to younger viewers, giving them someone to follow who is discovering what's happening alongside them.

The villain framing shifts too. Where Orwell's Napoleon was drawn from Stalin and the Soviet model, the film's version of corruption is updated to reflect more contemporary concerns — corporate greed, consumer distraction, the gap between what leaders say and how they live. Snowball, who is male in the book, is voiced here by Laverne Cox and written as female. The human antagonist is now a scheming billionaire named Freida Pilkington rather than the book's easygoing farmer neighbor.

These changes have frustrated critics who love the book — and that's a fair response. Orwell's allegory was precise. He was pointing at something specific, and the specificity is part of what makes it powerful. A version that softens the edges or shifts the target loses something real.

But here's what the film does get right: the core of the story survives. Power corrupts. Language is the first tool of the corrupt. Loyalty without watchfulness is not a virtue — it is a vulnerability. The animals who keep working, keep trusting, and keep telling themselves that leadership will come good eventually are the ones who lose the most.

Those ideas land. Even in a family-friendly animated film with a celebrity voice cast and a happier ending than Orwell wrote, they land.

What the Book Does That the Movie Can't

Orwell's ending is not happy.

The animals look through the farmhouse window at the pigs sitting with the humans — drinking, laughing, playing cards — and they cannot tell the difference between them anymore. The revolution has come full circle. The oppressor and the liberated have become the same thing.

That image is devastating. It is also one of the most honest things ever written about how power works.

The 2026 film gives audiences a more hopeful conclusion. That choice makes it accessible to children and easier to sit with. It also removes the thing that makes the book unforgettable.

If a child sees the movie and seems moved by it or curious about it — give them the book. Not to ruin the movie. To complete the thought. The book is short. It reads fast. And the ending will stay with them in a way the film's ending won't.

You can find Animal Farm by George Orwell on Amazon.

The Lantern Path in the Barnyard

Chaos rarely announces itself. It usually arrives slowly — through small compromises, through rules that shift just a little, through leaders who seem reasonable until they don't.

Napoleon doesn't seize power all at once. He earns trust first. He changes things incrementally. He rewards those who don't ask questions and isolates those who do. By the time the other animals see what has happened, it is already done.

Watchfulness — the second stage of the Lantern Path — is exactly what the animals of Animal Farm fail at. Not because they're stupid. Because watchfulness is hard. It requires noticing uncomfortable things. It requires asking questions when it's easier to trust. It requires being willing to see the gap between what you're being told and what is actually happening.

Boxer the horse is the most tragic figure in the story for this reason. He is not lazy or cowardly. He works harder than anyone. His answer to every problem is I will work harder. But he never asks whether the work is serving the thing he believes it is serving. Effort without watchfulness is not enough. In the end, it is not even enough to save him.

This is the question the story leaves behind — for children and for adults:

What are you trusting without examining? And what would you see if you looked more closely?

Worth Seeing — And Worth Reading

The 2026 Animal Farm is imperfect. Critics have been largely unkind to it, and some of that criticism is earned — the film softens what Orwell sharpened, and it trades the book's moral precision for broader accessibility.

But a story doesn't have to be perfect to be useful. If it gets someone asking the right questions — why did the pigs act like that, why didn't the others see it, what would I have done — it has done something real.

Let the movie be the door. Let Orwell finish the thought.

Struggle Society is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.